Blogs I Follow



       
Home Random Ask Me






younopoo:


(Interview from 1998) J.K. Rowling talking about Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone being made into a movie. 

Look where we are now.

The motion picture event of a generation.

younopoo:

(Interview from 1998) J.K. Rowling talking about Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone being made into a movie. 

Look where we are now.

image

The motion picture event of a generation.

Post by -hungarianhorntail (via karlimeaghan)
June 17, 2013 at 12:02 PM | Post Permalink | 9,220 notes



laroussegastronimique:

datkarkatass:

jicheshire:

bookworm-ninja:

betachan:

filthytricksyhobbitses:

ladyintheattic:

peppermintwinds:

senbo-sencho:

emimichelle:

lidlesseye:

freakingpotter:

H O W ?!

image

Holy shit

image

I keep trying to think of a good comment for this but I’m speechless, really.

My god.

image

there are no words

wow dang dangle

how

how

HOW

the second part is what got me 

ITS BACK

How?

How??

How???

(Source: freakingpotter2)

Post by freakingpotter2 (via danrdarrenc)
June 14, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 156,329 notes



Listen to my heart can you hear it sing: jilythesoulcrushingotp: hell in high heels: Sometimes I think about...

jilythesoulcrushingotp:

hell in high heels: Sometimes I think about how if Voldemort never existed and James and…

Sometimes I think about how if Voldemort never existed and James and Lily had lived, Harry probably would have had at least one sibling and Sunday dinners with Sirius and…

(Source: paralleltoparallel)

Post by paralleltoparallel (via danrdarrenc)
June 12, 2013 at 6:01 AM | Post Permalink | 1,120 notes



It had to be done xD

Post by whatevel (via preludity)
June 7, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 221,599 notes



mycroft-queenofcake:

theseasonofthewitch:

image

image

THE BEST POST

all I want is for them to go to a con cosplayed as each other

(Source: gishwhes)

Post by gishwhes (via danrdarrenc)
June 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM | Post Permalink | 111,873 notes



“The more we fuck up, which will be a lot, the funnier it will be I think.”

(Source: scruffylogan)

Post by scruffylogan (via danrdarrenc)
June 1, 2013 at 6:00 AM | Post Permalink | 5,864 notes



Potterhead vows: if the Queen is on your dash, you must reblog.

Post by smeagoled (via danrdarrenc)
May 31, 2013 at 6:01 AM | Post Permalink | 23,395 notes



(Source: tennantarse)

Post by tennantarse (via danrdarrenc)
May 28, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 6,996 notes



(Source: joeyrichtr)

Post by joeyrichtr (via karlimeaghan)
May 28, 2013 at 12:01 PM | Post Permalink | 6,218 notes



(Source: newtjorden)

Post by newtjorden (via danrdarrenc)
May 25, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 13,162 notes



(Source: tylerbrunsman)

Post by tylerbrunsman (via danrdarrenc)
May 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 9,514 notes



dduane:

miakosamuio:

mishastolemywormstache:

sandandglass:

CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

#NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.
It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.
In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.
If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s wand is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god  proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.
As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:
The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.
For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.
Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.
They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.
So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

Oh dear. CNN Money? Sorry, girls and boys, you just got pwned. HARD.

dduane:

miakosamuio:

mishastolemywormstache:

sandandglass:

CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

#NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.

It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.

In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.

If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s wand is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god  proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.

As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:

The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.

For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.

Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.

They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.

So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

Oh dear. CNN Money? Sorry, girls and boys, you just got pwned. HARD.

Post by sandandglass (via dduane)
May 20, 2013 at 6:01 PM | Post Permalink | 211,249 notes



“It has been…totally awesome.”

Post by yer-a-starkid (via danrdarrenc)
May 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM | Post Permalink | 1,861 notes



(Source: emilyblunts)

Post by emilyblunts (via danrdarrenc)
May 17, 2013 at 6:01 AM | Post Permalink | 2,009 notes



I need you to end this.

(Source: lumos-citylights)

Post by lumos-citylights (via danrdarrenc)
May 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM | Post Permalink | 425 notes




Welcome to Platform 9¾ | 1 / 23 Next »






"Wit beyond measure
is man's greatest treasure"




"It is our choices that show what we truly are,
far more than our abilities."
                                                     - Albus Dumbledore








Theme based on and images from Pottermore.com by J.K. Rowling
Originally coded for Tumblr by Jennifer at Tholaire. Modifcations for each house by Rachel Dana
Phoenix feather image from here; Elder leaf image from here.